Sooly⚡️سولي

🇺🇸The Great American Promise Scam: Documented…

Sooly⚡️سولي — Sun, 03 Nov 2024 01:05:29 GMT

🇺🇸The Great American Promise Scam: Documented Proofs of How Presidential Candidates Betray Voters

⚠️Dont Trust, verify⬇️

Imagine signing a contract where one side is free to lie, break promises, and face zero consequences. This is the American presidential campaign system, where the numbers reveal a devastating trend: recent presidents have fulfilled a steadily declining percentage of their promises – from George W. Bush’s 59% to Obama’s 48%, Trump’s 36%, and Biden’s current 32%. This isn’t due to inability, but a system that legally shields candidates from any real accountability.

Ironically, the #FirstAmendment, intended to protect honest discourse, allows presidential hopefuls to make grand promises without a shred of obligation to deliver. This means that statements made during campaigns cannot be legally enforced as contracts or binding obligations. This isn’t just about a few broken commitments – it’s a structurally protected loophole that transforms campaign speeches into consequence-free marketing pitches. Candidates stand on stage, selling promises they never intend to keep, backed by a legal shield that turns public trust into an unreturned deposit in a system built to protect deception. This applies to your beloved #Harris and #Trump.

🚩The Declining Trust: A 20-Year Spiral

🇺🇸Joe Biden (2020-2024)

🤑Economic Promise: “Support for the middle class” – Promised meaningful support for working families but has failed to pass essential policies, like affordable childcare and expanded healthcare, while corporate profits soar and wealth inequality deepens.
🚸Economic Relief Promise: “Immediate student loan relief” – Biden promised significant student debt forgiveness but has only provided limited relief, impacting a fraction of borrowers.
🩸Defense & Military Promise: “Return to diplomacy” – While pledging diplomacy, #Biden has authorized over $17 billion in military aid to #Israel, bolstering its military arsenal and supporting genocidal actions in occupied territories, further inflaming Middle East tensions and humanitarian crises.

🇺🇸Donald Trump (2016-2020)

👩🏾‍🌾Immigration Promise: “Mexico will pay for the wall” – Instead, American taxpayers shouldered the $11 billion cost, while immigration reform promises went unfulfilled.
💵Anti-Establishment Promise: “Drain the swamp” – Trump appointed numerous billionaires, corporate insiders, and former Goldman Sachs executives to top positions, despite his anti-establishment rhetoric. While, the Trump Organization had indirect ties with Goldman Sachs through investments in commercial properties.
🩸Defense & Military Promise: “End endless wars” – While Trump withdrew some troops, the U.S. remained heavily engaged in global conflicts. His administration increased drone strikes, with thousands of attacks primarily targeting the Middle East, and escalated tensions with Iran, culminating in the assassination of General Qasem Soleimani, which nearly led to war.

🇺🇸Barack Obama (2008-2016)

🤬Transparency Promise: “Most transparent administration in history” – Obama’s administration set records for denying Freedom of Information requests, expanded #NSA #surveillance, and failed to close #Guantanamo Bay despite repeated promises.
🤑Economic & Social Justice Promise: “Hope and Change” for struggling Americans – While Main Street suffered through foreclosures and rising inequality, Obama’s administration prioritized $29 trillion in #WallStreet bailouts, leaving 5 million families without #homes.
🩸#Defense & #Military Promise: “End the wars in #Iraq and #Afghanistan” – Instead, the wars continued and costs surged under #Obama, with U.S. operations expanding to seven countries, mainly in the #MiddleEast. His administration dropped 26,171 bombs in 2016 alone, with thousands of civilian casualties and a record number of drone #assassinations.

🇺🇸George W. Bush (2000-2008)

🌍Foreign #Policy Promise: “No nation building” – Launched two costly wars in Iraq and Afghanistan that continue to impact the Middle East and the U.S. economy, totaling $8 trillion and costing thousands of lives.
🤑Domestic Economic Promise: “Compassionate conservatism” – Bush’s administration prioritized #tax cuts for the wealthy while military engagements drained federal resources, leaving vital social programs underfunded.
🩸Defense & Military Promise: “Quick, decisive victory in Iraq” – #Bush’s wars led to spiraling costs and massive U.S. operations in the Middle East, including tens of thousands of drone strikes. #Bombing campaigns, especially in Iraq, took a heavy civilian toll. The Bush family has historic ties to major defense contractors, profiting indirectly from the defense industry’s surge during the War on #Terror.

⚠️Each broken promise isn’t just a statistic – it represents millions of shattered lives, empty wallets, and betrayed voters, all protected by a legal system that elevates political deception to an art form. This is not an accidental flaw; it’s an institutionally crafted mechanism that allows candidates to say what voters want to hear, knowing full well they may never follow through. So the next time you hear a campaign promise, remember: it’s not a commitment – it’s a legally protected sales pitch wrapped in the flag of constitutional protection.

I could trace over a century of broken promises by different U.S. presidents, but just look at the last twenty years. The message is clear: history repeats, and empty promises remain. Learn from this – don’t get fooled again.

———
#Nostr #Elections #Bitcoin #Geopolitics #introductions #asknostr #grownostr #photography ##art #labitconf #squirrel #asknostr #nostrtalk #newstr #nostrasia #tunestr #game #yostr #nature #siamstr #artsr #grownostr #memes #zap #facts #artwork #photostr #primal #damus #iris #amethyst #austrichs #economics #politics #USelections #whitehouse #bullshit

America’s Fragile Arsenal: How Much…

Sooly⚡️سولي — Thu, 31 Oct 2024 02:04:17 GMT

America’s Fragile Arsenal: How Much Longer Can the U.S. Keep Supplying Israel Without Sacrificing Its Own Security?

Since October 2023, as #Israel faces escalated threats from #Gaza and the broader #MiddleEast, the U.S. has spent an unprecedented $17.9 billion on Israel’s defense. This year alone has seen billions spent replenishing Israel’s Iron Dome system, sending emergency munitions, and covering the costs of U.S. Navy deployments in the region. Each #interception by Israel’s Iron Dome costs around $100,000, while the rockets it aims to destroy cost mere thousands. And the Lebanese #Resistance’s estimated 100,000-rocket stockpile in Lebanon looms as a potential next test.

In previous conflicts, like the 2006 #Israeli war on #Lebanon, the Resistance fired around 4,000 rockets, and Israeli forces acknowledged that the Resistance today is capable of firing up to 3,000 rockets per day in an escalated conflict. Such a scenario would require nearly continuous operation of Israel’s Iron #Dome systems, which are already consuming interceptors at a rapid pace during the ongoing conflict with #Gaza and Lebanon.

Imagine this: every minute, as Iron Dome interceptors explode in the sky over Israel, you are pouring American taxpayer dollars into each flash. Are those dollars keeping Americans safer? Or are they siphoning away the resources needed for America’s own future defense?

An Unrelenting Financial Toll on American Citizens

For U.S. taxpayers, the financial burden is mounting. While domestic costs rise and basic infrastructure in many U.S. cities goes neglected, you are funding a costly foreign conflict. Billions are spent to shield Israeli cities from attacks, yet at home, more than 30 million Americans face food insecurity, and countless communities remain without affordable housing or adequate healthcare. Are American citizens truly benefiting from this commitment? Or are their hard-earned dollars fueling a foreign military agenda that has little to do with their everyday lives?

The Pentagon is pushing U.S. manufacturers to accelerate production of interceptors and munitions for Israel. But for defense companies like Raytheon and Lockheed Martin, there’s a limit. Each surge in production risks stock prices and shakes the stability that shareholders demand. Under normal circumstances, companies have no incentive to jeopardize billions in market value for indefinite overseas conflicts. To force companies to comply without risking financial ruin, the U.S. might even need to consider a declaration of war—a move that could fundamentally alter the American economy and foreign policy.

A Countdown for America’s Own Defense?

The U.S. is now drawing from its own military stockpiles faster than it can replenish them, as American munitions are shipped overseas at a staggering pace. Should another crisis arise involving American forces, would there be enough left in reserve? Each Patriot missile or Iron Dome interceptor sent to Israel represents not just support for an ally but a potential gap in America’s own defenses. And in an increasingly volatile world, this is a gamble that grows riskier by the day.

Imagine a scenario where, due to these shortages, American forces find themselves in a conflict without the full range of defense options. How does a superpower protect its own citizens and commitments worldwide if its resources are spent on foreign soil?

A Question of Values: Who Is This War Really Serving?

Beyond the financial costs and security concerns lies an even deeper question for Americans: What are you truly supporting? Images from Gaza reveal a humanitarian crisis and civilian casualties that can’t be ignored. The death toll has been staggering—over 42,000 reported civilian deaths in Gaza alone. For many Americans, this raises serious ethical questions: Are U.S. weapons contributing to a devastating cycle of violence against innocent lives?

Public opinion in the U.S. is increasingly divided, with many citizens questioning the moral cost of America’s unwavering military support for Israel. Do these actions reflect the values America stands for—freedom, justice, and respect for human life—or are they eroding America’s global image, replacing ideals with brute power?

America’s Choice: A Turning Point for the Future

The United States now stands at a crossroads. It can continue pouring billions into a conflict with no end in sight, risking its own defenses, taxpayer resources, and global reputation. Or, it can reconsider its priorities, addressing pressing needs at home and preserving American resources for its own security. Every dollar spent abroad is a dollar not invested in America’s future—its infrastructure, its education, its healthcare, and its stability.

America’s path forward isn’t just about military strategy; it’s about protecting what the country values most: the well-being of its people and the principles it represents. The time has come to ask if these are the sacrifices Americans are truly willing to make.

Reference Note:

https://primal.net/e/note193t0lg9ek60v3ty20ge8lmyvnkvny5nk37da3symj6ux3ad7d7asy3u953

#Nostr #Bitcoin #introductions #elections #nostrasia #fiat

UNIFIL UNDER FIRE: ISRAEL'S LONG…

Sooly⚡️سولي — Tue, 15 Oct 2024 01:19:16 GMT

UNIFIL UNDER FIRE: ISRAEL'S LONG CAMPAIGN TO UNDERMINE PEACE IN LEBANON

{Preface}

As a Lebanese who worked with United Nations during the 2006 Israeli war, I’ve seen what occupation does to a nation. Our sovereignty, fragile as it may seem to the outside world, is something we fight for with every breath. We are more than a nation under siege—we are the spirit of resistance, determined to guard our freedom, even as the world looks the other way. Lebanon’s story is not unique. For decades, Palestine has suffered under the same assault, their right to exist eroded by the same aggressor. What’s happening to us is a prelude to what could happen elsewhere.

Every citizen living under a centralized financial system is, unknowingly, Lebanese. As central banks strip economic sovereignty, they mirror the erasure of borders through military occupation. If Israel continues unchecked, the world will eventually realize that we are all Palestinians and Lebanese, fighting battles for freedom that we never thought could be taken from us.

{Unifil Under Fire: Israel's Long Campaign To Undermine Peace In Lebanon}

On October 13, 2024, Israeli tanks rolled through the gates of a UNIFIL base in Ramyah, southern Lebanon, in a direct violation of international law. At around 4:30 a.m., two Merkava tanks destroyed the main gate of the peacekeeping base, forcing their way in and demanding that the peacekeepers turn off the base’s lights. For nearly an hour, they held control of the compound before withdrawing under protest from UNIFIL personnel. But the situation escalated further a couple of hours later when Israeli forces fired several rounds nearby, releasing smoke that seeped into the compound, leaving 15 peacekeepers suffering from skin irritations and gastrointestinal reactions.

This wasn’t an isolated incident. Just two days earlier, on October 11, Israeli shelling near UNIFIL’s Naqoura base had already injured several peacekeepers. And on October 12, Israeli soldiers had blocked a critical UNIFIL logistical convoy near Meiss ej Jebel, further restricting their freedom of movement. These are not random acts. They are part of a systematic effort by Israel to undermine the peacekeeping force’s mission and weaken Lebanon’s sovereignty.

{A History Of Violations}

To understand the scope of this problem, you need to look back. UNIFIL was established in 1978 after Israel’s invasion of southern Lebanon. Its mission: to maintain peace, monitor the cessation of hostilities, and ensure Israel’s withdrawal from Lebanese territory. However, Israel has consistently violated that mandate. One of the bloodiest episodes was the #Qana Massacre in 1996, when over 100 civilians taking shelter in a UN compound were killed by Israeli artillery fire. Another dark chapter came in 2006, during the Lebanon War, when Israeli airstrikes targeted a UNIFIL observation post near Khiyam, killing four peacekeepers from China, Austria, Finland, and Canada. These strikes continued for hours, despite repeated warnings to the Israeli military to halt the attack.

Since its inception, 325 UNIFIL personnel have lost their lives in Lebanon, many of them killed by Israeli actions. Between 2018 and 2020, Israel violated Lebanese airspace over 1,500 times, using drones and fighter jets to conduct surveillance and airstrikes in the region. But it’s not just air raids. There have been 85 recorded incidents between 2011 and 2020 where Israeli forces either blocked or detained UNIFIL personnel, directly impeding their ability to fulfill their mandate. Each violation chips away at Lebanon’s sovereignty, and each breach undermines the credibility of international peacekeeping efforts.

{Political Motives: Undermining Unifil To Control Southern Lebanon}

The recent escalation of attacks on UNIFIL is not without political context. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has made it clear that he wants UNIFIL out of southern Lebanon. In the days leading up to the October 13 attack, Netanyahu called for UNIFIL’s withdrawal, accusing the peacekeepers of serving as “human shields” for Hezbollah. But this narrative is a convenient excuse, one Israel has long relied on. By claiming Hezbollah is operating near UNIFIL positions, Israel justifies its continuous violations while providing no substantial evidence.

Israel’s true goal seems clear: removing UNIFIL from southern Lebanon would allow Israel to operate without the burden of international oversight, giving it greater freedom to strike Hezbollah and other targets at will. By attacking peacekeepers and restricting their movements, Israel sends a strong message to the world—we don’t want you here.

{International Reaction: Condemnation Without Consequences}

International reactions to Israel’s actions have been swift but largely symbolic. Over 40 countries contributing to UNIFIL, with 10000 UNIFIL military personnel in Lebanon, have condemned these violations, while UN Secretary-General António Guterres warned that attacks on UN peacekeepers could constitute war crimes under international law. Even the #UnitedStates, Israel’s staunchest ally, has called for restraint. Yet, these words have done little to stop Israel from continuing its aggressive behavior.

UN #Security Council Resolution 1701, adopted in 2006 to end hostilities between Israel and Hezbollah, explicitly calls for the protection of UN personnel and respect for Lebanese sovereignty. But every violation, every cross-border raid, and every act of aggression against UNIFIL undermines this resolution. The question is: how long will the world let this go on?

{What's At Stake}

This isn’t just about Lebanon anymore. Israel’s actions against UNIFIL represent a broader attack on international peacekeeping itself. If peacekeepers can be targeted without consequences, what does that say about the role of the United Nations in conflict zones? Lebanon’s sovereignty is at stake, but so is the credibility of international institutions.

And this extends beyond the battlefield. What’s happening in Lebanon is happening to the world, economically and politically. Every citizen living under a centralized financial system is, in many ways, already Lebanese. Central banks, like occupying armies, strip nations of their sovereignty. They dictate economic policies, control currencies, and reduce the #freedom of nations to govern their own destinies. The erosion of financial sovereignty is just another form of occupation, one that operates silently but no less destructively.

{Conclusion}

Israel’s unchecked aggression in Lebanon is not just an attack on borders—it’s an attack on the very concept of sovereignty. Lebanon’s fight is #Palestine’s fight, and soon, it could be the world’s fight. Every nation struggling under the weight of centralized financial control will eventually realize what we in Lebanon and Palestine have known for decades: the fight for sovereignty—whether it’s over land or over currency—is the same. We are all Palestinians and Lebanese, but most of the world doesn’t know it yet.

👇

As I’ve detailed in my paper "Exposing Expansionism: The Greater Israel Ideology and Its Threat to Lebanon" [Link below], what’s happening in southern Lebanon is part of a larger plan tied to the vision of Greater Israel. This ideology, which seeks to expand Israel’s borders beyond what is internationally recognized, has long been a driving force behind Israeli aggression. The relentless attacks on #UNIFIL and the civilian population are not random; they’re deliberate steps toward this territorial ambition.

You can find more on this in my investigation, where I dive deep into the historical roots, political figures like Netanyahu and Smotrich, and the settler organizations actively working to colonize southern #Lebanon.

The map #Netanyahu brandished at the 2024 #UN General Assembly, which effectively erased Palestine and extended Israeli control into #Lebanon and #Syria, is the clearest expression yet of these expansionist plans. If the international community continues to turn a blind eye, #Israel’s actions today will pave the way for further annexation and domination.

https://primal.net/e/note1h5mka24ayu0pagxczxqqm4u7eavl8wnpkgkstgwwpgnkvtthfj7qsqf3sk

#MiddleEast #Gaza #Beirut
#Nostr #Bitcoin #Nostrasia

Up until 2021:

Sooly⚡️سولي — Tue, 15 Oct 2024 00:04:56 GMT

Up until 2021:

The United States supports Israel with $3.8 billion annually in "direct" military aid, as part of a 10-year, $38 billion agreement signed in 2016. This is the largest foreign military aid package ever given by the U.S. to any country.

💡 Unveiling the Numbers: U.S. Military Support to Israel Explained

Did you know the United States provides Israel with approximately $4.7 billion in military support every year? 🤔 That's about $12.9 million per day! Let's break down where this massive amount goes and what it means. 📊

🌐 Total Annual Support: $4.7 Billion
Monthly: ~$393 million
Weekly: ~$90.7 million
Daily: ~$12.9 million

1️⃣ Direct Military Aid: $3.8 Billion Annually

A. Foreign Military Financing (FMF): $3.3 Billion
💰 Monthly: ~$275 million
🗓️ Weekly: ~$63.5 million
🕒 Daily: ~$9 million
🛡️ Purpose: Allows Israel to purchase U.S. military equipment and services.

B. Missile Defense Funding: $500 Million
💰 Monthly: ~$41.7 million
🗓️ Weekly: ~$9.6 million
🕒 Daily: ~$1.37 million
🛡️ Purpose: Supports Israel's missile defense systems like the Iron Dome.

2️⃣ Indirect Military Support: $915 Million Annually

A. Additional Missile Defense Funding: $150 Million
💰 Monthly: ~$12.5 million
🗓️ Weekly: ~$2.88 million
🕒 Daily: ~$411,000
🛡️ Purpose: Extra funds beyond formal agreements for missile defense enhancements.

B. War Reserves Stock Allies-Israel (WRSA-I): $100 Million
💰 Monthly: ~$8.33 million
🗓️ Weekly: ~$1.92 million
🕒 Daily: ~$274,000
🛡️ Purpose: U.S. military equipment stored in Israel for emergencies.

C. Excess Defense Articles (EDA): $50 Million
💰 Monthly: ~$4.17 million
🗓️ Weekly: ~$962,000
🕒 Daily: ~$137,000
🛡️ Purpose: Surplus U.S. military equipment provided at reduced or no cost.

D. Joint Military Exercises: $30 Million
💰 Monthly: ~$2.5 million
🗓️ Weekly: ~$577,000
🕒 Daily: ~$82,000
🛡️ Purpose: Combined training operations to enhance readiness and interoperability.

E. Research & Development Collaboration: $25 Million
💰 Monthly: ~$2.08 million
🗓️ Weekly: ~$481,000
🕒 Daily: ~$68,500
🛡️ Purpose: Joint development of advanced military technologies.

F. Loan Guarantee Savings: $10 Million
💰 Monthly: ~$833,000
🗓️ Weekly: ~$192,000
🕒 Daily: ~$27,400
🛡️ Purpose: Savings from reduced interest rates due to U.S. loan guarantees.

G. Defense Contracts Revenue: $200 Million
💰 Monthly: ~$16.67 million
🗓️ Weekly: ~$3.85 million
🕒 Daily: ~$548,000
🛡️ Purpose: Revenue for Israeli companies participating in U.S. defense contracts.

H. Intelligence Sharing Value: $50 Million
💰 Monthly: ~$4.17 million
🗓️ Weekly: ~$962,000
🕒 Daily: ~$137,000
🛡️ Purpose: Strategic benefits from shared intelligence operations.

I. Tax Expenditure from Donations: $300 Million
💰 Monthly: ~$25 million
🗓️ Weekly: ~$5.77 million
🕒 Daily: ~$822,000
🛡️ Purpose: Tax revenue forgone due to U.S. citizens' tax-deductible donations to Israeli organizations.

📊 Visualizing the Support

🔍 Why Does This Matter?
- Fiscal Impact: Understanding where taxpayer money goes helps promote transparency and informed discussions on budget priorities.
- Strategic Alliance: Highlights the depth of the U.S.-Israel relationship and its implications for foreign policy and regional stability.
- Economic Considerations: Raises questions about the allocation of resources and potential alternative uses for these funds.

💭 What Are Your Thoughts?
Do these figures surprise you? Should there be changes in how military aid is allocated? Share your opinions below! Let's engage in a constructive conversation. 🗣️💬

Like and Share if you found this informative!

𝘕𝘰𝘵𝘦: 𝘈𝘭𝘭 𝘧𝘪𝘨𝘶𝘳𝘦𝘴 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘣𝘢𝘴𝘦𝘥 𝘰𝘯 𝘥𝘢𝘵𝘢 𝘢𝘷𝘢𝘪𝘭𝘢𝘣𝘭𝘦 𝘶𝘱 𝘵𝘰 𝘚𝘦𝘱𝘵𝘦𝘮𝘣𝘦𝘳 2021. 𝘍𝘰𝘳 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘮𝘰𝘴𝘵 𝘳𝘦𝘤𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘪𝘯𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘮𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯, 𝘳𝘦𝘧𝘦𝘳 𝘵𝘰: 𝘜.𝘚. 𝘋𝘦𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘵𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘰𝘧 𝘚𝘵𝘢𝘵𝘦, 𝘊𝘰𝘯𝘨𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘢𝘭 𝘙𝘦𝘴𝘦𝘢𝘳𝘤𝘩 𝘚𝘦𝘳𝘷𝘪𝘤𝘦 (𝘊𝘙𝘚), 𝘚𝘵𝘰𝘤𝘬𝘩𝘰𝘭𝘮 𝘐𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘯𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘢𝘭 𝘗𝘦𝘢𝘤𝘦 𝘙𝘦𝘴𝘦𝘢𝘳𝘤𝘩 𝘐𝘯𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘵𝘶𝘵𝘦 (𝘚𝘐𝘗𝘙𝘐), 𝘜.𝘚. 𝘎𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘯𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘈𝘤𝘤𝘰𝘶𝘯𝘵𝘢𝘣𝘪𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘺 𝘖𝘧𝘧𝘪𝘤𝘦 (𝘎𝘈𝘖), 𝘐𝘴𝘳𝘢𝘦𝘭 𝘔𝘪𝘯𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘺 𝘰𝘧 𝘍𝘰𝘳𝘦𝘪𝘨𝘯 𝘈𝘧𝘧𝘢𝘪𝘳𝘴, 𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘞𝘩𝘪𝘵𝘦 𝘏𝘰𝘶𝘴𝘦 (𝘰𝘧𝘧𝘪𝘤𝘪𝘢𝘭 𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘴 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘴 𝘳𝘦𝘭𝘦𝘢𝘴𝘦𝘴), 𝘜.𝘚. 𝘋𝘦𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘵𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘰𝘧 𝘋𝘦𝘧𝘦𝘯𝘴𝘦, 𝘍𝘦𝘥𝘦𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘰𝘧 𝘈𝘮𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘯 𝘚𝘤𝘪𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘴 (𝘍𝘈𝘚), 𝘊𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘳 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘚𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘨𝘪𝘤 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘐𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘯𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘢𝘭 𝘚𝘵𝘶𝘥𝘪𝘦𝘴 (𝘊𝘚𝘐𝘚), 𝘉𝘳𝘰𝘰𝘬𝘪𝘯𝘨𝘴 𝘐𝘯𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘵𝘶𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯, 𝘊𝘰𝘶𝘯𝘤𝘪𝘭 𝘰𝘯 𝘍𝘰𝘳𝘦𝘪𝘨𝘯 𝘙𝘦𝘭𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘴 (𝘊𝘍𝘙), 𝘈𝘳𝘮𝘴 𝘊𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘳𝘰𝘭 𝘈𝘴𝘴𝘰𝘤𝘪𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯, 𝘜.𝘚. 𝘌𝘮𝘣𝘢𝘴𝘴𝘺 𝘪𝘯 𝘐𝘴𝘳𝘢𝘦𝘭, 𝘙𝘈𝘕𝘋 𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘱𝘰𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯, 𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘞𝘢𝘴𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨𝘵𝘰𝘯 𝘐𝘯𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘵𝘶𝘵𝘦 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘕𝘦𝘢𝘳 𝘌𝘢𝘴𝘵 𝘗𝘰𝘭𝘪𝘤𝘺, 𝘔𝘪𝘥𝘥𝘭𝘦 𝘌𝘢𝘴𝘵 𝘐𝘯𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘵𝘶𝘵𝘦, 𝘑𝘦𝘸𝘪𝘴𝘩 𝘝𝘪𝘳𝘵𝘶𝘢𝘭 𝘓𝘪𝘣𝘳𝘢𝘳𝘺 (𝘈𝘮𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘯-𝘐𝘴𝘳𝘢𝘦𝘭𝘪 𝘊𝘰𝘰𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘦 𝘌𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘱𝘳𝘪𝘴𝘦), 𝘜.𝘚.-𝘐𝘴𝘳𝘢𝘦𝘭 𝘉𝘶𝘴𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘴𝘴 𝘐𝘯𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘦 (𝘜.𝘚. 𝘊𝘩𝘢𝘮𝘣𝘦𝘳 𝘰𝘧 𝘊𝘰𝘮𝘮𝘦𝘳𝘤𝘦), 𝘈𝘮𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘯 𝘐𝘴𝘳𝘢𝘦𝘭 𝘗𝘶𝘣𝘭𝘪𝘤 𝘈𝘧𝘧𝘢𝘪𝘳𝘴 𝘊𝘰𝘮𝘮𝘪𝘵𝘵𝘦𝘦 (𝘈𝘐𝘗𝘈𝘊), 𝘑 𝘚𝘵𝘳𝘦𝘦𝘵, 𝘕𝘦𝘸 𝘈𝘮𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘤𝘢 𝘍𝘰𝘶𝘯𝘥𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯, 𝘚𝘵𝘪𝘮𝘴𝘰𝘯 𝘊𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘳, 𝘜𝘯𝘪𝘵𝘦𝘥 𝘕𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘴 𝘙𝘦𝘨𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘳 𝘰𝘧 𝘊𝘰𝘯𝘷𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘢𝘭 𝘈𝘳𝘮𝘴, 𝘞𝘰𝘳𝘭𝘥 𝘉𝘢𝘯𝘬 (𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘦𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘰𝘮𝘪𝘤 𝘥𝘢𝘵𝘢), 𝘐𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘯𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘢𝘭 𝘔𝘰𝘯𝘦𝘵𝘢𝘳𝘺 𝘍𝘶𝘯𝘥 (𝘐𝘔𝘍), 𝘙𝘦𝘶𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘴, 𝘈𝘴𝘴𝘰𝘤𝘪𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘥 𝘗𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘴, 𝘉𝘭𝘰𝘰𝘮𝘣𝘦𝘳𝘨, 𝘍𝘪𝘯𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘪𝘢𝘭 𝘛𝘪𝘮𝘦𝘴, 𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘕𝘦𝘸 𝘠𝘰𝘳𝘬 𝘛𝘪𝘮𝘦𝘴, 𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘞𝘢𝘴𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨𝘵𝘰𝘯 𝘗𝘰𝘴𝘵, 𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘞𝘢𝘭𝘭 𝘚𝘵𝘳𝘦𝘦𝘵 𝘑𝘰𝘶𝘳𝘯𝘢𝘭, 𝘏𝘢𝘢𝘳𝘦𝘵𝘻, 𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘑𝘦𝘳𝘶𝘴𝘢𝘭𝘦𝘮 𝘗𝘰𝘴𝘵, 𝘈𝘭-𝘔𝘰𝘯𝘪𝘵𝘰𝘳, 𝘋𝘦𝘧𝘦𝘯𝘴𝘦 𝘕𝘦𝘸𝘴, 𝘑𝘢𝘯𝘦'𝘴 𝘋𝘦𝘧𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦 𝘞𝘦𝘦𝘬𝘭𝘺.

#nostrasia #nostr #bitcoin #US #Israel #palestine #lebanon #iran #war #military #aid